Suppose
Rizal likes ice cream. So far he can always buy it from
AP, the seller, at an inexpensive price.
AP usually gets his ice cream material, --blueberries and raisins--, from mostly
Aco and, for smaller amount,
Ujang. Why
Aco? Because he offers lower price than
Ujang.
It turns out that
Sjamsu, by taking, say,
Hillary and
Barack's money, subsidizes
Aco's soybean blueberries and raisins that allows him to become major supplier.
Of course
Ujang dislikes the idea, but the question is: Should
Rizal and
AP condemn
Aco and
Sjamsu for taking
Hillary and
Barack's money for lower price of blueberries, raisins, and henceforth, inexpensive ice cream?
No comments:
Post a Comment